Difference between Restricted Freedom and Deprivation of Freedom. Ideally, every crime committed should have consequences. Fortunately, a significant percentage of crimes are indeed solved. But what awaits those who cross the line of the law? It depends on the severity of the offense. Let’s explore two types of criminal penalties and clarify the difference between restricted freedom and deprivation of freedom.

Definition:

Restricted freedom: A measure where the convicted individual is not physically excluded from society but is subject to certain prohibitions.

Deprivation of freedom: A punishment involving the enforced serving of a sentence in special, isolated areas.

Comparison:

In both cases, serious restrictions are applied. However, the key difference between restricted freedom and deprivation of freedom is that the former is considered milder. With restricted freedom, it is important not to violate specific rules, but overall, one can continue to live in normal conditions.

What are the limitations with restricted freedom? Primarily, one cannot change their address or leave a specific territory without permission. Additionally, there are regulated curfew hours, restrictions on attending public events, and changing jobs. To confirm compliance with the imposed rules, the convicted individual is required to regularly report to supervisory authorities and be accountable for their behavior.

The second measure, deprivation of freedom, is much harsher. In this case, offenders are sent to places with a special regime such as prisons, correctional facilities, or mental health institutions. The goal here is both the reformation of the citizen and ensuring that, while under custody, they do not commit further crimes.

What distinguishes restricted freedom from deprivation of freedom beyond what’s mentioned? One significant aspect is that restricted freedom can be both a standalone and an additional punishment. However, as a primary measure, restricted freedom is only applied for relatively less serious crimes. Meanwhile, as an additional punishment, it is sometimes imposed after deprivation of freedom. The aim is the gradual adaptation of an individual, previously subject to a harsh regime, to normal life conditions.

On the other hand, deprivation of freedom is always the primary punishment, applicable for serious crimes, and the sentence duration can be several times longer than that imposed with restricted freedom.